Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- start [2019/06/09 12:42] – [June 2019 - Rushcliffe Borough Council is reported as trying to sell off Lutterell Hall for development.] fulford
+++ start [2019/06/09 13:02] – [July 2018 - The end of planning constraints in West Bridgford] fulford
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 ===== News =====
 ===== June 2019 - Rushcliffe Borough Council is reported as trying to sell off Lutterell Hall for development. =====
+{{ :pasted:20190609-134148.png}}
 West Bridgford Community Hall, in recent years re-badged by Rushcliffe Borough Council as "Lutterell Hall". The hall has been a prominent part of West Bridgford life since 1929. Used as  a daily preschool, a venue for wedding receptions, political hustings, childrens parties, community meetings and for for numerous miscellaneous activities and classes the** Rushcliffe web site** says this:
 "**Lutterell Hall is an extremely attractive period building situated in a prime central West Bridgford location.
-{{:pasted:20190609-134148.png}}
 The Hall is ideal for wedding receptions and celebrations of all kinds. It is adjacent to St Giles' Church and Central Avenue and within walking distance of West Bridgford Methodist Church and Holy Spirit Catholic Church.
@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 Those who want to stop this latest move to create private profit at the expense of the communtiy should scoot over to https://www.change.org/p/rushcliffe-borough-council-save-lutterell-hall
-=== July 2018 - The end of planning constraints in West Bridgford ====
+==== July 2018 - The end of planning constraints in West Bridgford =====
 [[https://gallery.fulford.net/picture.php?/8941/category/296|{{https://gallery.fulford.net/_data/i/upload/2019/04/24/20190424234508-412325a1-la.jpg}}]]
 This monstrous great concrete and glass box that dominates the skyline and provides a picture window to all the neighboring gardens was not required to go through planning consent by Rushcliffe Borough Council. Because it contains concrete and glass the planners deemed that the construction was broadly similar to that of the beams and stucco of the Edwardian frontage. Nor was creation of a 2nd floor deemed to be a significant change in the shape of the roof. The local residents were not given the opportunity to comment, still less object and the build went ahead under permitted development.
@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 I think from this point forward we can assume that no one in Bridgford will have to concern themselves with planning consent for any development.
-[[https://gallery.fulford.net/picture.php?/6125/category/291|{{ https://gallery.fulford.net/_data/i/upload/2018/10/04/20181004110356-32e8caff-me.jpg?600x900}}]]
 [[ News | More & Belated News ]]